What Is A Spiritual Universalist

The philosophical and theological concept of universalism states that some ideas have universal application or applicability.

Before You Continue...

Do you know what is your soul number? Take this quick quiz to find out! Get a personalized numerology report, and discover how you can unlock your fullest spiritual potential. Start the quiz now!

Another major element of universalism is the belief in a single underlying truth. The living truth is regarded as having a broader scope than national, cultural, or religious limits or interpretations. “Truth is one; sages call it by numerous names,” the Rig Veda says. A universalist society may highlight the universal principles of most religions while accepting others in a welcoming manner.

Universalism can also refer to the pursuit of unification of all human beings beyond geographic and other barriers, as well as the implementation of universal or universalist principles such as human rights or international law in the modern world.

Modern-day Hinduism has been influenced by universalism, which has in turn influenced modern Western spirituality.

Christian universalism is the belief that everyone will be saved in some way, whether religious or spiritual, at some point in their lives. It is also known as universal reconciliation.

HTML tutorial

Do Universalists believe in Jesus?

Universalist Thomas Wittemore writes in his Plain Guide to Universalism, “Universalists are defined by their belief that, in the end, every person of the human race will become holy and happy. This does not refer to the entirety of their faith, but rather to the aspect of it that is unique to them and distinguishes them from the rest of the world.”

Christian universalism's remaining basic ideas are consistent with Christianity in general:

  • See New Covenant for further information on Jesus Christ, who reveals the essence and character of God and is the spiritual leader of humanity.
  • Humankind is born with either an eternal soul that will not be destroyed by death or a mortal soul that will be revived and/or protected by God.
  • In this life and in the afterlife, sin has terrible consequences for the sinner.

The Universalist General Convention, subsequently known as the Universalist Church of America, adopted the Five Principles in 1899: belief in God, belief in Jesus Christ, belief in the immortality of the human soul, belief in the consequences of sinful actions, and belief in global reconciliation.

The Christian Universalist Association adopted a declaration of faith in 2007 that included theosis as a sixth component. Theosis, which can be interpreted as divinization or the process of becoming more God-like, refers to the process of all souls becoming reconciled and conformed to the image of the glorified risen Christ in the framework of Christian universalism.

What did Universalists believe?

Universalism is the belief that all souls will be saved. Although Universalism has occurred in Christian history at various periods, most notably in the works of Origen of Alexandria in the 3rd century, it was born in the United States in the middle of the 18th century as an organized movement. The Enlightenment was instrumental for softening Calvinistic theology's harsher features and paving the ground for the return of the notion of universal redemption. Universalists felt that a loving God could not choose to save only a fraction of humanity while condemning the rest to eternal damnation. They insisted that afterlife punishment was only for a short time, during which the soul was purified and readied for eternity in God's presence.

Does the Bible support universalism?

Universalism is a doctrine that is plainly stated in the Bible in a number of places. “Just as one trespass resulted in condemnation for all people,” Paul writes in Romans 5:18, “so also one virtuous act resulted in justification and life for all people.” The context of the entire chapter makes it apparent that the “one transgression” was Adam and Eve's sin, and that the “one righteous act” was Jesus' death on the cross. Notice how it mentions “justification” rather than just “life”? It's not just about physical resurrection for everyone; it's also about fresh spiritual life and forgiveness for everyone.

What do u call a person who believes in God but not religion?

Agnostic theism, also known as agnostotheism or agnotheism, is a philosophical position that embraces both theism and agnosticism. The existence of a God or Gods is believed by an agnostic theist, but the basis for this belief is uncertain or fundamentally unknowable. The attributes of the God or gods that the agnostic theist believes in may also or alternatively be agnostic.

Is universalism heretical?

(1, 363), which he describes as a “dangerous error undermining the Biblical faith,” highlights a dilemma that has divided theologians since Origen's day. Despite being explicitly condemned as heresy by the fifth ecumenical council, the concept has frequently found supporters among the ranks of theology of dubious stature. It's impossible to dismiss the support of contemporary figures like Nicolas Berdyaev, William Temple, John Baillie, C. H. Dodd, Charles Raven, and Herbert Farmer, who have all spoken out more or less publicly in its favor. They can't all be labeled as liberals and disregarded as such. Is Brunner correct in asserting that a theory of universal restoration is incompatible with a really just society?

What is the difference between universalism and relativism?

Three approaches to the topic of how to effectively conduct intercultural discourse on ethics among people who have diverse cultural views and values are discussed. Universalist methods argue that it is possible to construct a set of standards that apply equally to all cultures, but they fail as a framework for intercultural discussion on ethics since there is no consensus across cultures on what is “universal.” Relativist techniques are founded on the premise that each culture has its own set of values and norms that are incommensurable with those of other cultures, but they fall short because they don't give a practical mechanism for individuals from various cultures to work together effectively to solve shared problems. The paper advocates for a third approach, constructivism, which claims that because the rules needed to govern cross-cultural interactions do not yet exist, they can only be created through a dialogical process in which participants attempt to critique existing norms and arrive at a more appropriate set of norms capable of resolving the specific problems they face.

HTML tutorial