What Are The Literal And Spiritual Senses Of The Scriptures

The four senses of Scripture are a four-level approach to Bible interpretation. This approach began in Christianity and was adopted by the Kabbalah in Judaism.

Before You Continue...

Do you know what is your soul number? Take this quick quiz to find out! Get a personalized numerology report, and discover how you can unlock your fullest spiritual potential. Start the quiz now!

Literal, allusive, allegorical, and mystical are the four meanings of biblical texts in Kabbalah. The four senses in Christianity are literal, allegorical, tropological, and anagogical.

What is the literal sense of Scripture?

A biblical text is to be understood according to the “plain meaning” supplied by its grammatical construction and historical context, according to literal interpretation. The literal meaning is thought to accord to the writers' purpose.

What are the 2 senses of the Scripture?

115 According to an old tradition, there are two interpretations of Scripture: literal and spiritual, with the latter separated into allegorical, moral, and anagogical meanings. The richness of the living reading of Scripture in the Church is guaranteed by the profound concordance of the four senses.

116 The literal sense is the meaning provided by Scripture's words and revealed by exegesis, which follows sound interpretation rules: “All other interpretations of Sacred Scripture are literal.”

HTML tutorial

117 In a religious sense. Because of God's plan's unity, not only the words of Scripture but also the facts and events it speaks about can be signs.

(1) In a metaphorical sense. By acknowledging events' meaning in Christ, we might gain a deeper understanding of them; for example, the crossing of the Red Sea is a sign or type of Christ's victory as well as Christian Baptism.

(2) Sense of morality The events described in the Bible should motivate us to act justly. They were written “for our instruction,” as St. Paul puts it.

(3) In a didactic sense (Greek: anagoge, “leading”). Reality and events can be viewed in terms of their eternal significance, pointing us toward our true homeland: the Church on Earth is therefore a sign of the heavenly Jerusalem.

The Letter is about acts; it is an allegory about faith; it is a moral about how to act. Anagogy is our fate. 87

What is the literal sense of the Bible story?

The Catholic response to this question is that there is no basis for this disagreement. The first two chapters of Genesis were never designed to be “scientific” in the modern sense from the standpoint of biblical interpretation. God created the universe out of nothing, according to the biblical creation story, and the ramifications of this fact are significant. It doesn't go into detail on the natural processes that led to this, and it never pretended to. Because they are communicating two separate things, there can be no conflict between the biblical account and an accurate scientific account. As a result, based on this “conflict,” science cannot claim that Christianity is incorrect.

In my first post, I described a scientific interpretation of the biblical creation narrative as one that goes to “literal” extremes. By this, I mean a reading in which the primary interpretation of the text is either that God created the world in seven 24 hour periods, or that “days” may not refer to our modern understanding of a day, but that natural phenomena were somehow put into the world by God in more or less their current form at the time of creation. Fundamentalists often defend these “scientific” readings while evolutionists critique them. I believe it is inappropriate to speak to these different meanings as “literal.” They're interpretations that misunderstand figurative language as scientific truth, which is why I'm calling them “scientific” readings. The first sense of the creation tales in Genesis was never meant to be scientific, hence a truly “literal” interpretation is one in which the first sense of the Scripture is disclosed.

The contrasts between the various “senses” of Scripture are clearly laid forth in the Catholic Church's Catechism. Scripture can be interpreted in two ways: literally and spiritually. “The literal sense is the meaning transmitted by Scripture's words and revealed through exegesis, following the standards of sound interpretation: ‘All other senses of Sacred Scripture are dependent on the literal'” (See CCC 116.) This means that the “literal” sense is the first meaning that competent exegesis uncovers. The desire to grasp what the authors of Sacred Scripture intended to say is inherent in exegesis. “In order to discover the sacred authors' intention, the reader must take into account the conditions of their time and culture, the literary genres in use at the time, and the modes of feeling, speaking, and narrating then current,” the Catechism says. (See CCC 32).

In exegesis, the question is what the author's aim was in authoring the Biblical creation account. This is an extremely difficult subject, but I believe Pope Benedict XVI's work provides us with a strong starting point. He explains that the first Biblical creation account arose from Israel's encounter with Babylon's pagan myths, which resulted in a “dramatic confrontation implicit in this biblical text, in which all these confused myths were rejected and the world was given its origin in God's Reason and in his Word,” according to him (In the Beginning, 13).

HTML tutorial

He uses Scripture as an example, citing the sun and moon as lights that God has hung in the sky to measure time. Reducing the sun and moon to time measurements when they were considered deities would have been sacrilegious to pagan peoples. “Here we see the bravery and temperateness of the faith that, in facing pagan myths, made the light of truth arise by proving that the universe was not a demonic conflict, but that it sprang from God's Reason and reposes on God's Word,” writes the author (Ibid.,14). Because the authors of the Scripture intended to use figures to write anything as a part of their chosen genre, this would be a part of the literal interpretation, the first sense of the Scripture, according to the Catechism. This literal view, on the other hand, isn't a fundamentalist “scientific” one. This distinction is made by the Pontifical Biblical Commission in terms of “literal” and “literalist”:

The spiritual sense of Scripture states that “not only the language of Scripture, but also the facts and events about which it talks can be signs” because of the oneness of God's design (CCC 117). The metaphorical, moral, and anagogical senses of spirituality are all subdivided. With so much emphasis on the proper meaning of a “literal” interpretation of Scripture in the science-religion debate, it's easy to forget that these other senses are just as valid as the first. Indeed, “the profound concordance of the four senses guarantees all its richness to the living reading of Scripture in the Church” (CCC 115). When we misread or lose sight of the literal meaning, however, the spiritual meaning loses its foundation. Without a basic literal meaning, the spiritual meaning within the context of the deposit of faith is meaningless.

As a result, limiting the “literal” sense of scripture to an inaccurate “scientific” reading has two effects. The first is that there is no shared interpretation between science and faith. Outside the Church, the literal, primary interpretation of a text is the one that can be understood. The literal understanding of the biblical creation myth is, in fact, one of courageous confrontation with the world, a singular affirmation of who Israel's God is. This kind of meaning never goes out of style, and it's critically required in today's arguments between science and religion, as well as secularism and faith in general. Fundamentalism “accepts the literal truth of an outdated, out-of-date cosmology simply because it is found expressed in the Bible; this inhibits any conversation with a larger way of perceiving the relationship between culture and faith,” according to the Pontifical Biblical Commission (I. F). When those outside the Church lose touch with the Church, unneeded and terrible conflicts arise, such as the purported evolution versus creation argument.

The second consequence is that, because the spiritual sense loses its base without the literal meaning, we are prevented from finding the broadest and most profound meanings of Scripture by losing the literal meaning. This is especially evident in the metaphorical meaning, in which the Old Testament events acquire their real significance in Christ. We can't appropriately apply them to Christ or understand him in light of the initial meanings of the texts unless we understand the literal first meaning.

Finally, based on the opening chapters of Genesis, this sad alleged confrontation between religion and science teaches us the necessity of the Magisterium and Tradition in the Church. We run into problems with “literalist” or “scientific” interpretations when Scripture is taken out of its correct context in the life of the Church and her full history of interpretation. The Church is the one that teaches us to look for the “literal” meaning intended by the sacred authors. After all, the Bible is a “divinely inspired scripture entrusted to the Church by God Himself for care and interpretation” (Divino Afflante Spiritu, 24).

What is the difference between literal and spiritual sense regarding interpretation of Scripture?

What the author meant by the words he wrote in a literal sense. The literal sense is concerned with the meaning of Scripture's words. The “realities and occurrences” that can be indicated by the words are what the spiritual sense alludes to.

What are the literal and spiritual senses of Scripture quizlet?

What do the Scriptures mean in literal and spiritual terms? The literal sense refers to the meaning provided by Scripture's language and revealed through exegesis. The spiritual sense considers what the reality and events of Scripture mean in addition to their literal meaning.

What are the three spiritual senses of Scripture quizlet?

The allegorical sense, the moral sense, and the anagogical sense are the three types of spiritual sense in Scripture.

What are spiritual senses?

Activate your spiritual senses. You, too, can utilize your spiritual sight to connect to the heavenly plan, just as prophets and visionaries around the world have been able to perceive the divine workings in visions. Using visualizations during meditation and prayer to enhance and expand your ability to store images in your mind is crucial to developing spiritual sight. When you communicate to Christ or angels in prayer, practice envisioning them and imagine what paradise looks like. Soon, you'll have dreams and have moments of awake inspiration.

HTML tutorial

God's voice can be heard. God is constantly communicating to us, but we are not listening, and part of the reason for this is that our spiritual sense of hearing has not grown. Learning to calm the noise in your mind is essential for hearing spiritual messages. Try to keep extraneous thoughts to a minimal during meditation or prayer, and instead focus on God's love and beauty. When something comes up that bothers you, pray for a remedy from God. If you have a clear mind, you will hear His voice clearly speaking to you, as it always does.

God's Word is to be tasted. The living God's Word is believed to fill the hearts of hungry mankind. While in meditation or prayer, practice improving your ability to truly taste these words. Observe how your mind and body are hungry for a variety of things in the world. Now consider how focusing on God's love is more satisfying and eliminates the need for many of these things. Feel the sweetness of His words and how they fill the soul. Keep a few treasured Bible passages with you at all times so that the words of God are always available to quench your spiritual thirst.

The Lord's presence is palpable. As we go about our everyday jobs and chores, many of us feel alone. Concentrate on the notion that God is around you at all times to enhance your spiritual feeling ability, and focus on this during prayer or meditation. Soon, you'll be able to sense his soothing presence all around you.

Take a whiff of the garden that awaits you. Smell has the ability to elicit strong emotions, memories, and mental states. Practice smelling the flowers that bloom in the earthly paradise that awaits humanity while in prayer or meditation. Take note of how clear of pollution and man-made dirt the air is. Allow the scents to transfer you to a different frame of mind that will stay all day.

What are the three spiritual senses readers of the Bible must look for?

Spiritual interpretation is a science that is both analytical and spiritual at the same time. It is also an art, steeped in contemplation, rather than just a science. Some typology is the result of Spirit-led scientific exegesis, while others are the result of personal reflection. There are different types of people.

The Fathers separated three spiritual senses in order to elucidate the discernment of spiritual senses: allegorical, moral, and anagogical. Thus, a scripture could express a moral truth about how a Christian should live, an allegorical truth about Jesus Christ's life or person, and an anagogical truth about heaven, in addition to its literal meaning. Spiritual exegesis was used by Ephrem, Athanasius, Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine, Gregory the Great, and Cassian to extract doctrinal and mystical riches from the Bible. Augustine went so far as to suggest that he couldn't have become a Christian without first studying spiritual exegesis of the Old Testament, because the wrongdoings of the Hebrew patriarchs had scandalized him.

Of course, not all spiritual exegetes were Augustine's equal in brilliance and artistry. Based on mistranslations or misunderstandings of the biblical writings, some allegorical commentary is overdone, strange, and just plain wrong. To the exclusion of the literal, historical sense, a few early commentators frequently used the allegorical method. As a result, certain disastrous spiritual exegetical conclusions were reached that flatly contradicted historical truth. When arguing for the primacy of the literal sense, Saint Thomas Aquinas spoke out against such abuses: “All other interpretations of Sacred Scripture are literal.”

The excesses tarnished the reputation of spiritual exegesis. As a result, its popularity among academics has fluctuated throughout history. The twentieth century was a downer, with commentators, for the most part, preoccupied on the literal meaning of Scripture. This manifested itself in some people's minds as irrationalism gone wild: a slavishly historical reading of the Bible, rejecting the action of a God who transcends time. On the other hand, a fundamentalist pursuit of the “simple sense” of Scripture resulted from an overemphasis on the literal, forgetting that what looks “clear” to us moderns can seem completely wrong to a long-ago Israelite or Christian.

The Catholic Church, on the other hand, has never thrown the baby out with the figurative bathwater of some commentators. The Church has always emphasized a holistic reading of Scripture that encompasses both literal and spiritual meanings.

HTML tutorial

Reading Scripture as though God mattered, according to Tradition, has an intrinsic meaning. Or, to use Vatican II's kinder language, it's reading the Bible “with the intention of recognizing its divine authorship” (DV, 12).

The Catholic Church's Catechism unequivocally supports spiritual exegesis of the Bible: “According to an old tradition, there are two interpretations of Scripture: literal and spiritual, with the latter split into allegorical, moral, and anagogical meanings. The richness of the living reading of Scripture in the Church is guaranteed by the profound concordance of the four senses” (no. 115, emphasis omitted). In this edition of the Bible, “all of its splendor.” That's a strong assurance!

The Catechism backs up this promise with details: “The figures are revealed by this re-reading in the Spirit of Truth, beginning with Christ (cf. 2 Cor 3:14–16). The deluge and Noah's ark, as well as the cloud and the Red Sea passage, all foreshadowed salvation by Baptism (cf. 1 Pet 3:21). Water from the rock symbolized Christ's spiritual gifts, while manna in the wilderness foreshadowed the Eucharist, “the genuine bread from heaven” (John 6:32; cf. 1 Corinthians 10:1–6).” (number 1094).

So, what does all of this entail in practice? Jesus desires that you and I read the Bible in its entirety. He wants us to perceive what Gerard Manley Hopkins, a poet, dubbed “the loveliest freshness deep below things”—not just the superficial beauty, though that can be enjoyable as well. He wants us to have everything we want.

Learning to read the Bible in this manner entails relearning how to read and even see. This isn't just a trick, though. It's a gift, and we'll never be able to earn it on our own. As a result, we must start with prayer. Origen, a third-century Scripture scholar, advised as much in his book “The spiritual meaning conveyed by the law is understood only to those who have received the Holy Spirit's gift in the word of wisdom and knowledge.” That's why the majority of old Catholic Bibles included the “Prayer to the Holy Spirit” is printed on the face of the card.

We'll learn to gaze through the things of this world to God in the Spirit, rather than just looking at them.

Dr. Scott Hahn is a well-known biblical scholar who has written over forty books on the Bible and faith. Scripture Matters: Essays on Reading the Bible from the Heart of the Church is a simple and comprehensive introduction to reading the Bible from the heart of the Church, as the title suggests.